In this two-part blog, I am going to talk about politics;
well, sort-of, but not really. In this two-part
blog, I am going to talk about atheism and belief in God; well, sort-of, but not
really. What I am going to talk about is
being human; something we can all relate to being. I am going to talk about a spiritual/philosophical/psychological
dynamic of being human which I am finding very curious these days. I believe whole-heartedly that humans are
more loyal to their own egos than to the truth; that humans can take very
little reality without having to put their defenses up and say “no.” There comes a point in conscience development
when the mind stops accepting things as they are, and begins to try to bend
them to how they are desired to be. And,
while I believe it is the job of philosophy and psychology to help diagnose and
understand this phenomenon, I believe spirituality and psychology can offer a
way out of the situation (if that is even desired).
I begin with a story I heard in college: a man comes to a
rabbi, and asks to study the Torah and Prophets. The rabbi asks, “Why do you want to study?” The man says, “Rabbi, I am trying to study
all the religions because I want to see which one is most true. So I am studying them all, and then I will
decide on which is the most true.” The
rabbi said, “I will not teach you.” The
man upset asks, “Why Rabbi? I want to study, I am genuinely interested. Will
you not teach me?” And the rabbi
answered, “No, first you decide, then we will study.”
I have always been intrigued by this story, and the rabbi’s
demand: “first you decide, then we will study.”
And whether I like it or not that is how we as humans come to our
knowledge as time goes on; we make a decision, and then we study. The error of this order is obvious, but
necessary in many ways. Pre-conceived
belief is an easier way for our minds to take in mass amounts of contradictory data. Without a belief or beginning prejudice this
process would almost be impossible. However, once one decides on a
point-of-view, then one begins to see how information and facts help fortify
that view. Likewise, one sees more readily facts and
information that attack or dismiss any opposing view. In the long-run, without another opening up of
the mind, the mind begins to be completely warped by prejudice or beliefs; and
data collection will inevitably shut-down. What is worse, is that the ego
begins to identify itself with the belief; or perhaps it is better to say, that
the idea or prejudice becomes more of a matter of ego than truth: the ego's identity is in the belief. To see the consequences, one only need to
look around our world today.
For an example let us take our current Presidential race.
Many many have decided long ago who they were going to vote for in this
election (Was that necessary? Responsible?).
And once they made that decision, they usually only see data that
confirms and conforms to their view or prejudice; likewise they dismiss any
data that attacks their view. Take a
look and you will see Pro-Hillary Clinton persons see very little or nothing wrong
with her. Every bump in the road is a
challenge she rose up against; she is not a messiah, but she is certainly on a pedestal. Everything her opponents say, whether it is
Donald Trump or Gary Johnson is wrong, and deserves condemnation. Likewise, many who support Donald Trump laud
him. They see that he does nothing or little wrong (and if he does it pales in
comparison to the treachery of the opponents).
Likewise, they can see no good in either Hillary Clinton or Gary Johnson,
both would literally “ruin” this country.
Supporters of Gary Johnson…well, I think my point is clear. In reality, if we are honest, all three are
human beings; and being human does mean that they are not 100% evil, or 100%
great: those are abstract concepts, not human beings. Likewise, their supporters
are not 100% evil or 100% good; again an abstract concept. And what does it mean if one can honestly say
they find NOTHING wrong with the views of their candidate, or NOTHING good
about the views of the persons they are not voting for?
But we will explore this more in the second half when we
correlate it to belief in God. I leave
the reader with a challenge: can you observe yourself apart from yourself? Can you see and identify your beliefs and
prejudices (whether good or bad) and how they affect the data and news you see?
No comments:
Post a Comment